Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
Assignment Design that Promotes Critical Thinking and Academic Integrity
  • Gloria Holland and Rachel Walker
  • Towson University
  • October 26, 2006
2
Objectives
  • To identify instructional approaches that model best practices for research and citation.
  • To employ teaching techniques to avoid plagiarism.


3
 
4
Assignment Challenge #1
  • Assignment for a 100-level course– with 200 students:  Write a two-page paper on eating a high fat diet the week before a big race rather than the typical high carbohydrate diet.  The “coach” indicates that a high fat diet will be better for energy reserves than high carbohydrate.  Is the coach right or wrong?
  • Guidance:  Cite scientific evidence to support your position; provide a one-page list of references annotated with a search log (how did you find the information, what was the rationale for choosing one source over another, and is the information reliable.)


5
Assignment Challenge #2
  • Assignment for a 100-level English Course:  Explore a topic by reviewing print scholarly journals; develop criteria for choosing 5-7 “good” journals; present findings to class.
  • Guidance:  Go to the journal stacks on the 4th floor and browse journals; journals must be scholarly and criteria must be logical.
6
Assignment Challenge #3
  • Assignment for a 100-level Sociology course:  Write a five-page paper to determine the involvement of campus in military-industrial complex (how many researchers working on defense-related projects, etc.).
  • Guidance:  Provided sample research questions; suggested interviewing students, professor, administrator and calling the Pentagon library.
7
Assignment Challenge #4
  • Assignment for Composition I:  Pick a topic and find books/journal articles/news articles on topic.
  • Guidance:  Record the number of books on the topic; book title/call number or article title/journal, newspaper title or article.
8
Assignment Challenge #5
  • Assignment:  Find 25 sources on topic and annotate; write author analysis for each source used; and write paper using sources gathered.
  • Guidance:  Use a variety of resources
9
Discussion Board Activities
Example 1
  • Original Quote:  Angelo, T. A., & Cross, K. P. (1993).  Classroom assessment techniques:  A handbook for college teachers (2nd ed.).  San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    • “In many fields, particularly the professions and the service sector, success depends on one’s ability to translate highly specialized information into language that clients or customers will understand.”
  • Cited in Paper:
    • Angelo and Cross (1993) suggest translating highly specialized information to a level so others will be able to interpret the communication.


10
Discussion Board Activities
Example 1
  • Original Quote:  Angelo, T. A., & Cross, K. P. (1993).  Classroom assessment techniques:  A handbook for college teachers (2nd ed.).  San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    • “In many fields, particularly the professions and the service sector, success depends on one’s ability to translate highly specialized information into language that clients or customers will understand.”
  • Cited in Paper:
    • Angelo and Cross (1993) suggest translating highly specialized information to a level so others will be able to interpret the communication.


11
Discussion Board Activities
Example 2
  • Original Quote:  Angelo, T. A., & Cross, K. P. (1993).  Classroom assessment techniques:  A handbook for college teachers (2nd ed.).  San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    • “In many fields, particularly the professions and the service sector, success depends on one’s ability to translate highly specialized information into language that clients or customers will understand.”
  • Cited in Paper:
    • To be successful, one must be able to translate highly specialized information into language customers and clients understand --especially in the professions and service sector fields.


12
Discussion Board Activities
Example 2
  • Original Quote:  Angelo, T. A., & Cross, K. P. (1993).  Classroom assessment techniques:  A handbook for college teachers (2nd ed.).  San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    • “In many fields, particularly the professions and the service sector, success depends on one’s ability to translate highly specialized information into language that clients or customers will understand.”
  • Cited in Paper:
    • To be successful, one must be able to translate highly specialized information into language customers and clients understand --especially in the professions and service sector fields.  (Source?)


13
Discussion Board Activities
Example 3
  • Original Quote:  Angelo, T. A., & Cross, K. P. (1993, p.232).  Classroom assessment techniques:  A handbook for college teachers (2nd ed.).  San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    • “In many fields, particularly the professions and the service sector, success depends on one’s ability to translate highly specialized information into language that clients or customers will understand.”
  • Cited in Paper:
    • Communicating directly to your audience in terms they can understand is important.

14
Discussion Board Activities
Example 3
  • Original Quote:  Angelo, T. A., & Cross, K. P. (1993, p.232).  Classroom assessment techniques:  A handbook for college teachers (2nd ed.).  San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    • “In many fields, particularly the professions and the service sector, success depends on one’s ability to translate highly specialized information into language that clients or customers will understand.”
  • Cited in Paper:
    • Communicating directly to your audience in terms they can understand is important. (Source?)

15
Direct Plagiarism Instruction
  • Plagiarism Instruction Online: Assessing Undergraduate Students' Ability to Avoid Plagiarism (Jackson, 2006)
    • Use a plagiarism tutorial
      • Define plagiarism
      • Examples of proper citation and paraphrasing
    • Allows more class time for practice paraphrasing
  • Plagiarism: The Crime of Intellectual Kidnapping
    http://tutorials.sjlibrary.org/tutorial/plagiarism/index.htm


16
Annotated Bibliographies
  • Format
  • Citation in appropriate format (either MLA or APA)
  • Annotation begins on line following citation
  • Annotations are usually 150 words, but may vary based on instructions (Engle, Blumenthal, &  Cosgrave, 2005)
17
Annotated Bibliographies
  • According to Lyons (2005), information in annotation may include
  • Purpose and scope of the work
  • Format and content
  • Basis and validity of argument
  • Credentials of author
  • Intended audience
  • Value and significance to field
  • Bias or problems
  • Student’s impression
18
Annotated Bibliographies
  • Samples:
  • Annotated Bibliography for Journal Article
    http://www.library.cornell.edu/olinuris/ref/research/skill28.htm
  • Science and Writing
    http://owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/WAC/science_writing.html
  • Critical Annotation
    http://www.library.mun.ca/guides/howto/annotated_bibl.php
19
Annotated Bibliographies
  • Instructional reasons
  • Guide students in developing a thesis (Stacks & Karper, 2001)
  • Demonstrate scope and quality of student research (Lyons, 2005)
  • Place research in a context (Stacks & Karper, 2001 ; Lyons, 2005)
  • Provides opportunity for critical thinking (Engle, Blumenthal, &  Cosgrave, 2005, Lyons, 2005)
  • Deter plagiarism (Harris, 2004)


20
Annotated Bibliographies
  • Prevent plagiarism
  • Allows instructor to assess whether or not students have used or understood cited references
    • Remedy problem prior to final paper
    • Require certain source material
  • Few papers require them, making it more difficult to purchase the paper (Harris, 2004)


21
Annotated Bibliographies
  • Assessing annotated bibliographies
  • Annotated Bibliography Rubric
    http://people.sunyit.edu/~boylank/frc104_ab.pdf#search=%22rubric%20annotated%20bibliography%22
  • Annotated Bibliography
    http://www.uwec.edu/markgrjs/lmed/Rubric.pdf#search=%22rubric%20annotated%20bibliography%22
  • Annotated Bibliography Marking Rubric
    http://www.ucalgary.ca/%7enatsci/science503/503ABrubric.pdf



22
Reputable Resources
  • Define this for your students
  • Provide examples via a bibliography
  • Teach skills to critically analyze sources
  • Indicate what is not acceptable



23
Analyzing Information Sources
 http://www.library.cornell.edu/olinuris/ref/research/skill26.htm
  • “Initial Appraisal:
    • Author
    • Date of Publication
    • Edition or Revision
    • Publisher
    • Title of Journal”


  • “Content Analysis:
    • Intended Audience
    • Objective Reasoning
    • Coverage
    • Writing Style
    • Evaluative Reviews”
24
Evaluating Web Sites
http://www.library.cornell.edu/olinuris/ref/research/webeval.html
  • In addition to that for books and journals, consider:
    • Comparability with other sources
    • Stability of Information
    • Objectivity
    • Currency
    • URL
    • Authenticity
25
Staging
  • Possible stages, according to Harris (2004)
  • Topic
  • Annotated Bibliography
  • Outline
  • Research materials
  • Rough draft or introduction
  • Final draft


  • Incorporate the opportunity for feedback and interaction throughout the writing process, such as sharing resources or topics in class or orally defending an argument (Nowakowski, 2006)
26
Staging
  • Instructional reasons
  • Improves quality of writing (Harris, 2004; Council of Writing Program Administrators [CWPA], 2003)
    • Support at multiple steps in writing process (CWPA, 2003)
    • Opportunity to recognize and correct weak points in writing or research (Harris, 2004; CWPA, 2003)
  • Allows for more advising opportunities through “low stakes” writing (CWPA, 2003)
  • Familiarizes instructor with student’s original work (CWPA, 2003)
  • Deters plagiarism (Harris, 2004)
27
Staging
  • Prevents plagiarism
  • Familiarizes instructor with student’s original work (CWPA, 2003)
  • Allows instructor to spot potential problems with citation (Harris, 2004)
  • Provides opportunity to discuss proper citation (Harris, 2004)
  • Interaction and feedback ensures students are familiar with resources and work (Nowakowski, 2006)
  • Difficult to “reverse engineer” paper (Harris, 2004)
  • Reduces procrastination
    • Procrastination may be linked to plagiarism (Roig & DeTommaso, 1995)


28
Staging
  • Isn’t it more work for the instructor?
  • Yes
  • Manage additional work by
    • Presenting some stages in class/small groups
    • Starting project early
      • Allows time for revision by student
      • Allows time for review by instructor
    • Keeping copies of draft material
    • Using rubric for grading

  • The end result will be a better learning experience and product for students.


29
Bibliography
  • Council of Writing Program Administrators (2003). Defining and Avoiding Plagiarism: The WPA Statement on Best Practices. Retrieved September 25, 2006, from http://www.ilstu.edu/~ddhesse/wpa/positions/WPAplagiarism.pdf.
  • Engle, M., Blumenthal, A.,  & Cosgrave, T (2005). How to Prepare an Annotated Bibliography. Retrieved September 25, 2006, from http://www.library.cornell.edu/olinuris/ref/research/skill28.htm.
  • Georgetown University Honor Council (2006).  What is Plagiarism?  Retrieved September 11, 2006 from
  • http://gervaseprograms.georgetown.edu/hc/plagiarism.html.


  • Harris, R. (2004). Anti-Plagiarism Strategies for Research Papers. Retrieved September 25, 2006, from http://www.virtualsalt.com/antiplag.htm.
30
Bibliography (cont.)
  • Jackson, P. A. (2006). Plagiarism Instruction Online: Assessing Undergraduate Students' Ability to Avoid Plagiarism. College & Research Libraries, 67(5), p 418-428.


  • Lyons, K. (2005). How to Write an Annotated Bibliography. Retrieved September 25, 2006, from http://library.ucsc.edu/ref/howto/annotated.html.
  • Nowakowski, F. (2006). Assignment Design Strategies. Retrieved September 25, 2006, from http://plagiarism.dal.ca/faculty/assignment.html.


  • Olin & Uris Libraries (2004).  Critically Analyzing Information Sources.  Retrieved September 26, 2006 from
  • http://www.library.cornell.edu/olinuris/ref/research/skill26.htm.
31
Bibliography (cont.)
  • Olin & Uris Libraries (2005).  Evaluating Web Sites:  Criteria and Tools.  Retrieved September 26, 2006 from
  • http://www.library.cornell.edu/olinuris/ref/research/webeval.html.


  • Olin & Uris Libraries (2006).  The Seven Steps of the Research Process.  Retrieved September 26, 2006 from
  • http://www.library.cornell.edu/olinuris/ref/research/skill1.htm.


  • Roig, M and DeTommaso, L. (1995). Are college cheating and plagiarism related to academic procrastination? Psychological Reports, Vol 77(2), 691-698.


  • Stacks, G. and Karper, E. (2001).  Annotated Bibliographies. Retrieved September 25, 2006, from http://owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/
    general/gl_annotatedbib.html.


32